"How do we show up in ChatGPT?" Now you have an answer.
Every client is about to ask about AI visibility, if they haven't already. Viz gives you the measurement layer: per-client prompt tracking, competitor benchmarks, and crawl analytics - across every WordPress site you manage.
A new deliverable your current stack can't produce.
Clients want AI answers
SEO reports don't cover ChatGPT, and there's no Search Console for AI assistants. When the client asks how they rank in AI, most agencies are guessing.
One-off tooling doesn't scale
Manually asking chatbots about each client is unrepeatable and unbillable. You need scheduled, comparable numbers that hold up in a monthly report.
Per-seat pricing punishes portfolios
Most visibility tools price for one brand. Managing twenty client sites shouldn't mean twenty separate subscriptions and twenty logins.
One subscription. Every client site. Real numbers.
Pricing is per tracked website - a single subscription covers 1 to 100 sites, so adding a client is a quantity change, not a new contract.
Per-client visibility tracking
Each site gets its own tracked prompts, competitors, and metrics - mention rate, citations, sentiment, share of voice - refreshed on schedule and ready to drop into your reporting. AI visibility →
Crawl data as the opener
The free plugin shows a client how much of their traffic is already AI - the single most convincing slide in an AEO pitch, and it costs you nothing to produce. Analytics →
Custom plans for networks
Beyond 100 sites, or need hand-tailored prompt and engine limits with an aggregated multi-site view and priority support? The Custom tier is built for exactly that. See plans →
AEO is the first new line item since social - and it needs its own numbers.
Every platform shift creates a window where clients need help faster than they can build expertise. Search did it, social did it, and answer-engine optimization is doing it now. The difference this time is that the platform gives you nothing: there is no Search Console for ChatGPT, no impression report from Perplexity, no rank tracker for Claude. Whoever produces credible numbers first owns the conversation.
The numbers that hold up in a client report are the boring, repeatable kind: the same prompts, asked of the same engines, on the same schedule, scored the same way month over month. Mention rate and citation rate are the AI-era equivalents of rankings; share of voice against named competitors is what turns a curiosity into a budget line. One-off chatbot screenshots cannot do that work - trend lines can.
There is also a wedge here that costs you nothing. The free plugin's crawl data answers a question every client finds mildly alarming: how much of your site's traffic is already machines? That single chart - this many AI crawlers, reading these pages, this often - opens the AEO conversation better than any deck, because it is the client's own data. Measurement first, retainer second.
Common questions, straight answers.
Can I white-label or export the numbers for client reports?
The metrics are built to be reported: per-site prompt tracking with mention rate, citations, sentiment, and share of voice, trended over time. Pull them into your existing reporting workflow alongside the SEO numbers your clients already expect.
How does pricing work across a portfolio?
Per tracked website, on one subscription - 1 to 100 sites, so onboarding a new client is a quantity change rather than a new contract. Past 100 sites, or for custom prompt and engine limits with an aggregated view, there is a Custom tier.
What do I actually deliver in month one?
A baseline. Install the free plugin to capture each client's real traffic mix, then start tracked prompts for their highest-value buyer questions. Month one establishes where they stand in AI answers and who wins the citations they lose; every month after that is trend - which is where the retainer lives.
Do my clients need to be technical to understand the output?
No. The core story is three numbers a client understands immediately: how often AI mentions them, how often it cites them, and how they compare to the competitor they care most about. The crawl data adds the visceral opener - machines are already reading your site every day.
How do we scope an AEO retainer so it doesn't collapse into the SEO one?
Give it its own deliverable and its own cadence. The monthly AEO report stands on four numbers the SEO report cannot produce: AI crawl volume by operator, most-fetched content, mention and citation rate on tracked prompts, and AI-referred session quality. The work between reports - refreshing the pages retrieval bots fetch, closing citation gaps competitors win, adjusting bot policy - is distinct from link and ranking work, which is exactly what keeps it a separate line item.