Viz vs Conductor
Conductor is what enterprise looks like in this category: fifteen-plus years of search intelligence, acquisitions like ContentKing and Searchmetrics, and a platform now positioned as the system of record for AEO - sold through demos, priced on request. Viz is the other end of the spectrum: a WordPress plugin you install today, free. Here is the honest comparison.
What Conductor does well.
A decade of search intelligence
Keyword tracking at 60,000-keyword scale, benchmark research across billions of sessions, and enterprise clients like Siemens and Lowe’s. Conductor’s depth of data and services is real and hard-earned.
Real-time site monitoring
The ContentKing acquisition gave Conductor 24/7 crawling and change monitoring with alerting - enterprise-grade technical vigilance across large site portfolios.
All-in on enterprise AEO
AI Search Performance, Conductor Creator, AgentStack with MCP and API access, plus partnerships embedding it in Acquia and Optimizely. The enterprise AEO positioning is aggressive and coherent.
Viz and Conductor, side by side.
| Viz | Conductor | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | WordPress site owners and the teams behind them | Enterprise organizations with large site portfolios |
| Where it lives | A plugin in your wp-admin, plus a cloud dashboard | An enterprise SaaS platform; CMS reach via Acquia and Optimizely partnerships; no mention of WordPress on their site as of Aug 2026 |
| AI answer tracking | 10 prompts on 4 engines daily on Lite ($99); 20 prompts on 8 engines on Pro, with per-model breakdowns | Mentions, citations, share of voice, and sentiment across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, and Claude |
| AI bots on your server | Free plugin logs every request server-side: per-URL crawl data, request log, coverage | AI Bot Crawling Reports advertised; collection mechanism not detailed on their site as of Aug 2026 |
| Content | 10 to 50 reviewed articles/mo, written from your own AI-traffic evidence, delivered into Posts → Drafts and tracked per piece | Conductor Creator generates and scores content; 60 to 600 Writing Assistant drafts/yr by tier |
| AI-referred conversions | Purchases, bookings, leads and sign-ups credited to each AI assistant, captured inside WordPress from your commerce and form plugins; free on every plan | No mention of AI-referred conversion attribution on their site as of Aug 2026 |
| Tools for AI agents | WebMCP tools on every page (describe, contact, and WooCommerce shopping tools), /ai-contact/, capability map and agent requests; free | No mention for your site; Conductor's MCP server and AgentStack power your team's agents |
| AI bot control | Per-bot blocking with robots.txt plus server-level 403s and a verification probe | No mention of bot blocking on their site as of Aug 2026 |
| Entry price | Free forever; paid from $99/site/mo | No public prices; demo-led sales, annual contracts, usage-based tiers |
| Free to start | Free plan, no credit card | Essentials tier offers a "Try for Free" entry; no prices published |
Conductor details verified against Conductor's public pages as of August 2026; their pricing and features may have changed since. Conductor is a trademark of its owner; Viz is not affiliated with or endorsed by them. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.
A command center, or a tool you install today.
Different weight classes, honestly
Conductor is bought: demos, procurement, annual contracts, onboarding, services. Viz is installed: a free plugin this afternoon, $99 when you want the full loop. Neither is wrong - they answer different org charts.
WordPress is the home turf
Conductor’s CMS story runs through Acquia and Optimizely - enterprise DXPs. Viz’s runs through wp-admin: server-side logs, per-bot control, readability monitors, and drafts in Posts → Drafts, all native to the platform that runs over 40% of the web.
Per-URL proof, tomorrow morning
Viz closes its loop at the page level: the crawls that inspired a topic and the citations the published piece earns land in the same dashboard, reported daily. You do not need a system of record when the record lives where you publish.
Who should pick which.
Pick Conductor if: you are an enterprise with a portfolio of sites, an RFP process, and teams that need a shared command center with services behind it. In that world Conductor’s depth, monitoring, and partnerships genuinely earn the contract.
Pick Viz if: your site - or your clients' sites - run on WordPress and you want AI visibility and conversions working today without a sales call: free server-side visibility, per-bot control, answer tracking, conversions credited per assistant, and a content pipeline with per-piece proof.
Viz vs Conductor, asked plainly.
Is Viz really an alternative to Conductor?
For an enterprise running dozens of properties through a procurement process, no - Conductor is built for that job and Viz is not trying to be. The real comparison is for WordPress site owners and smaller teams who land on Conductor’s site and find no prices: Viz delivers the core loop - AI visibility tracking, server-side crawl analytics, bot control, evidence-driven content, conversions credited per assistant and tools for AI agents - as a plugin, free to start, $99 a month when you upgrade.
How does pricing compare when Conductor does not publish prices?
You cannot, directly: Conductor sells usage-based annual contracts through its sales team, with a free entry tier but no published dollar amounts as of August 2026. Viz publishes everything: $0 forever for the plugin, $99/site/mo for Lite, $499 for Pro, cancel anytime. If your budget process needs a number today, only one of these gives you one.
See your AI traffic before you pick anything.
More comparisons: Viz vs Profound · Viz vs Peec AI · Viz vs OtterlyAI · Viz vs AthenaHQ · all comparisons