Viz vs GetMint
GetMint is a fast-moving Paris startup that pairs AI answer tracking with execution: a Content Studio, mention building, and even AI shopping surfaces. Viz shares the monitoring-plus-execution conviction and adds the piece GetMint’s own blog says to pair it with: the server-side view of AI bots reading your site. Here is the comparison.
What GetMint does well.
AI shopping coverage
Tracking ChatGPT Shopping and Alexa shopping surfaces is a genuinely distinctive angle - for e-commerce brands, those answers are already purchase decisions, and few tools watch them.
Monitoring plus execution
A Content Studio for briefs and articles plus offsite mention building means GetMint sells action, not just dashboards - the right instinct in a category full of monitor-only tools.
Aggressive early momentum
Founded in 2025, EUR 4M raised, shipping constantly, and led by a proven fintech founder. GetMint iterates in public and moves quickly.
Viz and GetMint, side by side.
| Viz | GetMint | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | WordPress site owners and the teams behind them | CMOs, e-commerce brands, and agencies (France-first, expanding) |
| Where it lives | A plugin in your wp-admin, plus a cloud dashboard | A standalone SaaS dashboard; no mention of a WordPress plugin or CMS integration as of Aug 2026 |
| AI answer tracking | 10 prompts on 4 engines daily on Lite ($99); 20 prompts on 8 engines on Pro, with per-model breakdowns | 50 prompts at $80/mo; 300 at $349/mo; tracks 10+ engines including shopping surfaces |
| AI bots on your server | Free plugin logs every request server-side: per-URL crawl data, request log, coverage | No mention of server-side crawl analytics; their own blog recommends pairing with a log analyzer for bot visibility |
| Content | 10 to 50 reviewed articles/mo, written from your own AI-traffic evidence, delivered into Posts → Drafts and tracked per piece | Content Studio generates briefs and articles on credits (1 article/mo on Starter, 6 on Growth); publishing them is up to you |
| AI-referred conversions | Purchases, bookings, leads and sign-ups credited to each AI assistant, captured inside WordPress from your commerce and form plugins; free on every plan | No mention of AI-referred conversion attribution on their site as of Aug 2026 |
| Tools for AI agents | WebMCP tools on every page (describe, contact, and WooCommerce shopping tools), /ai-contact/, capability map and agent requests; free | Tracks where products appear in agentic commerce surfaces (ChatGPT Shopping, Alexa); no mention of an endpoint on your site |
| AI bot control | Per-bot blocking with robots.txt plus server-level 403s and a verification probe | No mention of bot blocking on their site as of Aug 2026 |
| Entry price | Free forever; paid from $99/site/mo | $80/mo Starter; $349/mo Growth |
| Free to start | Free plan, no credit card | "Start free, no credit card" (trial terms not stated on site) |
GetMint details verified against GetMint's public pages as of August 2026; their pricing and features may have changed since. GetMint is a trademark of its owner; Viz is not affiliated with or endorsed by them. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.
Execution is shared ground. The evidence is not.
What decides the topics
GetMint’s content starts from tracked prompts and content gaps - outside-in evidence. Viz adds the inside half: which pages AI bots actually fetch, what your readability scans flag, what you are starting to rank for. The drafts are aimed by what machines already do on your site.
Where the drafts land
GetMint’s Content Studio produces articles in its platform; getting them live is your workflow. Viz delivers reviewed drafts straight into Posts → Drafts with a hero image set - publishing is one WordPress click, and tracking starts on its own.
The crawl side is not an add-on
GetMint’s own writing acknowledges it watches outputs, not bot visits, and suggests pairing it with a log analyzer. Viz is that missing half and the visibility tracker in one tool - and the crawl side is free.
Who should pick which.
Pick GetMint if: you are an e-commerce or consumer brand that wants AI shopping surfaces tracked, values offsite mention building, and wants monitoring plus content in one dashboard - especially in the French and European market it serves first.
Pick Viz if: your site runs on WordPress and you want the loop wired end to end: server-side evidence deciding topics, drafts landing in your CMS, and every published piece measured for crawls, citations, referrals, and the conversions they turn into.
Viz vs GetMint, asked plainly.
Both Viz and GetMint generate content. What is actually different?
Three things. Sourcing: GetMint works from tracked prompts and competitive gaps; Viz also reads your server - AI crawl activity, readability scans, rising queries - so topics come from evidence about your own site. Delivery: GetMint’s articles live in its studio until you move them; Viz delivers reviewed drafts into Posts → Drafts, where publishing is one click. Proof: Viz tracks every published piece per URL for AI crawls, citations, and referral visits, with a fresh report every morning.
GetMint tracks more engines than Viz. Should that decide it?
It depends which surfaces earn you money. GetMint's 10+ engines include shopping surfaces like ChatGPT Shopping and Alexa - if you are an e-commerce brand, that coverage is a real reason to pick them. Viz's four to eight engines are the major AI engines where most buying research happens, tracked daily with per-model breakdowns, and paired with the on-site half no external tracker sees.
See your AI traffic before you pick anything.
More comparisons: Viz vs Profound · Viz vs Peec AI · Viz vs OtterlyAI · Viz vs AthenaHQ · all comparisons